DSM10000

I also replaced the tailboard struts. It's one of those tasks that, like many others, could be completed much faster if you had to do it again. Despite owning many high-quality vehicles, including a 911 Turbo, I find the Mercedes-Benz to be the most exciting to drive. Even my wife likes it over her Tiguan for long excursions. Dogs like it as well. Despite being over 17 years old, the vehicle runs well. I like the convenience of being able to repair it in my workshop, saving time and money compared to bringing it to a professional.

I was uncertain about the exact origin of the black smoke first. I suspected a faulty PCV valve would be flinging oil into the turbo due to oil surrounding the turbo entrance. However, upon inspection, the old PCV valve seemed to be in good condition. It's possible that the fuel pressure sensor led to over fueling, resulting in black smoke that damaged the O2 sensor. The damaged air intake batwing may have caused the ECU to get inaccurate readings from the MAF sensors, leading to over-fueling. Although I am not really sure, it is now operating perfectly. The automobile seems quite sturdy and well-built. I spent £500 on the vehicle, mostly on replacing parts, such as the PCV valve which was likely the original one.

I will outline the issues I have encountered with my beautiful dark blue 2006 E280 CDi Estate. I purchased the automobile from a tiny dealer in Surrey. I travelled from Scotland to Gatwick by plane and then took a train to the town where the car was located. The automobile was in excellent condition with 86,000 miles, extensive service records, and all features functioning properly. I went to a friend's home in Oxfordshire and stayed overnight. The following day, I headed north by getting on the M40 at Bicester, when I saw a little amount of smoke coming from the back of the vehicle. The situation deteriorated gradually and the vehicle was emitting excessive exhaust fumes even with little acceleration. It was humiliating when my vehicle went into limp mode without showing a check engine light. The issue improved by the time I arrived at The Lakes, but still emitted a large cloud of black smoke while accelerating hard after leaving Tebay services. Arrived home without any issues. The issue was diagnosed the next day. It was found that the air intake was damaged where it connects to the turbo, and the orange seal was deteriorating. Installed a high-quality OEM used part and replaced the PCV valve.I changed my scanner due to "low fuel pressure" and "Oxygen sensor fault" indications. Lambda resolved the issue by replacing the old sensor, which was coated in heavy soot, but the vehicle was still in limp mode. They then purchased a new fuel rail pressure sensor, first ordering the incorrect one and returning it before ordering and installing the proper one. The codes were cleared, resulting in improved performance with no smoke, more power, and smooth gear changes. Returned after a 300-mile journey and everything is well. I am glad to have repaired it independently. I am uncertain about the potential cost if I had brought it to a garage, but overall, I have spent around £500. I am expecting to get half of that amount back from the dealer. Enjoying the vehicle, next task is to replace the boot lid struts since the boot keeps slipping down.

I assure you that I do not mean to show any disrespect. I still rely on using Google to search for information, but I have become sceptical about the credibility of the review system, to be honest. Not just Google's, but also others. There is a proliferation of deceptive and sponsored reviews on the internet. I came saw a negative Google review for Merparts in Port Glasgow, which was evidently intended for a different firm. I filed a complaint with Google, however the likelihood of them taking any action remains uncertain. Apologies, OP, I did not want to divert your attention from the specific information you were discussing. May you discover a favourable location.

While Google is commendable, receiving a personal endorsement from a someone residing in the OP's vicinity who has firsthand experience would be much more advantageous.

My car is a W124 300E from 1988, hence I believe it is equipped with the 103 engine.I will examine it.Thank you.

Greetings, gentlemen.I am seeking to replace the fuel injectors on my W124 300E.Do you have any suggestions on the location where I may get the seals for the injectors?I am encountering difficulty in locating some .Assistance in any kind would be much appreciated.Appreciation is extended to you.

I would assess the resistance of the fill level sensor on the tank and juxtapose it with that of a verified operational sensor. It may be apparent that the sensor need replacement (uncertain whether it can be detached from the coolant reservoir?). If you are considering replacing it, I think Audi has introduced a strengthening strap as a retrofit measure to prevent the tanks from separating. I am currently unable to locate any information on the subject, but I am certain that it had significant importance. I would likely include it for the sake of durability.

All parameters, except pressure, are considered 'calculational', hence the ecu assumes it has knowledge of the ash content. The regeneration process of an automobile begins when either the computed value reaches its limit or when the pressure sensor reading hits a certain threshold. So, if I understand well, you are asking whether the calculation value remains constant despite the pressure differential not increasing? A plausible explanation for the significant smoke and filter contamination in real-life scenarios might be attributed to mechanical issues such as EGR leakage or excessive boost pressure.

Is the vehicle's mapping not modified or has the AdBlue system not been removed? Is the new Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) being instructed to reset the Electronic Control Unit (ECU)?

The SDS provides information on the permissible deviation in the smooth run test. However, the injectors own their individual correction values, which provide an indication of the injector's "condition".

The ECU is using rpm to measure combustion and is modifying injection time in an attempt to maintain consistent power levels across each cylinder. If the correction values exceed a certain threshold, it indicates a malfunction in the injector. Undoubtedly, any additional mechanical malfunction that impacts combustion efficiency, such as low compression pressure, may result in a similar outcome. Conducting a bench test will provide complete certainty.

If there is an imbalance in fuel delivery from certain injectors, it might lead to the formation of particles, which then accumulate in the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF). I have reservations about the notion that all of them are negative. Typically, when one component fails, others will compensate, potentially causing the xentry values to exceed the acceptable range. Frequently, the pipes of the DPF sensor might get obstructed, resulting in the occurrence of a failure code or the need for regeneration.

Is the disc brake dust shield deformed? Is there a stone trapped between the dust shield and the hub? Is the wheel hub worn?

An additional power source will still be required, such as a compact battery located in the trunk or a capacitor positioned in the front. My own auxiliary power supply is also no longer functional.

While in the automobile, my primary focus is on driving rather than engaging in phone conversations or texting. From your perspective, "traditional cruise control" is hazardous, whereas from my perspective, Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) is somewhat bothersome.

The Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system applied sudden and forceful braking as I drove into a school zone on a Sunday. The ACC is unable to predict my intentions. While inattentive drivers may benefit from it, I myself do not need it.

Click the confirm button to delete the message.

If you are referring to this particular display: Therefore, the response is negative. I just disregard it and it vanishes.

I suppose so. During the process of inspecting or verifying products. I consistently verify the manufacturing date of products, ensuring that all items are newly produced and not outdated stock. Previously, I replaced the front top mounts on a different vehicle. The mounts were Sachs, manufactured in Germany and had a recent production date. Perhaps I still have some remaining boxes for photographs.

Those are still manufactured in Germany or elsewhere throughout Europe. I am now doing a comprehensive renovation for my second vehicle. Purchased a complete set of Sachs shock absorbers and Lemforder suspension components. Not a single one of them is manufactured in China.

Few monts ago I have bought rear shocks.

Indeed, that is precisely why I used the term "mostly". Such components like suspension arms, among others, are manufactured in Poland. Furthermore, the joints are still manufactured in Germany. Sachs, a German manufacturer, produces original equipment manufacturer (OEM) shocks, not Lemforder. However, Sachs and Lemforder are really the same corporation.

That is incorrect. Lemforder is mostly manufactured in Poland at now. It is evident that the degree of quality control is rather poor.

The cost of a new aftermarket rear brake calliper is around £40, and it would take roughly 1-1.5 hours of work at a general garage to install it. Additionally, I would replace the brake line, which would cost around £10. This price should include the 1-1.5 hours of effort. I anticipate a payment of less than £150.