All Activity

I encounter no difficulty after adhering to the basic setup instructions; both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth must be enabled, and my iPhone connects and pairs effortlessly each time. 🤷‍♂️

Mine exhibits identical behaviour. 😩👍

My 2024 C-HR PHEV displays the identical (or comparable) screen upon each startup. I have cancelled it, as I have previously registered the vehicle with the MyToyota App, which provides complete remote capabilities, including trip recording and GPS tracking. After completing the setup process (which required providing approval through the app or the MyToyota website), I am periodically prompted by my vehicle to establish a personalised driving profile. I have not done so at this moment as I am the sole driver. It is a PHEV in Design Trim; therefore, it lacks electric seats with memory settings, which is why I have not pursued it. This may explain why the screen above consistently appears each time I start the vehicle. I must navigate through that screen and an additional warning screen on cautious usage while driving before accessing the functions of the Multimedia Display.

Yes, it is your My Toyota account. Have you installed the smartphone application and connected your phone to the vehicle via Bluetooth?

Why do I consistently get this issue every time I start the car? I have reset everything.

I previously examined that. They perform excellently in Middle Eastern countries, but are unsuitable for UK weather conditions.

There are solar chargers, although I am uncertain of their efficacy.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/166294403076?_skw=Sealey+E/Start&epid=13017006776&itmmeta=01KFCZD1W7W67MZJXVYWEAJ81N&hash=item26b7eb3804:g:NboAAOSwY0Jk5d1E&itmprp=enc:AQALAAAA0O7PUuNWmJ++UShgI9tQz/r7aLOYGXQbqxpWCCKfn1tvwBz4Du6Y06SFuXdAhM+R7SSzffhK5Jp5iHWZwi0bhN1G0ZbUEXFKJ1a+9L8OybpbP+/ea6DOHPWOcrk9nxTK8tkJQCXLmUi9vNrLdHWkGQnHrZ+KimnXxUuWvl9A0MwjJgD6xf3Cti3jBxFbLnof1As8iVU3XlL9JNnsX4YYe/zvCvCkw2q+UyAeqteblsk93NmFiEZ3kOgsM9N7kqWC7iJUSQRZHS5gqJXW0YkD8bY=|tkp:Bk9SR6KetJ_7Zg&mkevt=1&mkcid=1&mkrid=710-53481-19255-0&campid=5338774556&toolid=10001&customid=130832X1595858X32f0ff9abd1ad1d760a0f184c635f1c0&subId2=15

I possess a Sealey Electrostart, as referenced in the link, but I did not spend anything near that price; I continued to search for a deal and acquired two units for slightly over £110 each, specifically the 1600 amp models. Provided the car battery maintains a voltage over 5 volts, the vehicle will initiate without necessitating the frequent recharging of the pack, as it derives power from the residual charge in the car's battery.

E series vehicles manufactured between 2008 and 2011 may experience FRM corruption due to low battery conditions or battery disconnection.

Which automobile do you possess?

Greetings, everyone My residential circumstances, namely an assigned underground parking space devoid of access to 240v electricity, coupled with my driving patterns characterised by several short trips, are adversely affecting my battery's performance. I experimented with several portable chargers overnight, but their capabilities are insufficient unless I invest exorbitant amounts. The optimal approach would be to remove the battery for indoor charging; however, I have been informed that this practice is inadvisable, since it may result in rendering the FRM inoperative. Is this genuinely a matter of concern? It appears to be nonsensical, as you are effectively performing the same action as if the battery were replaced with a new one.

Not all of these plates endure. The tester must utilise the age-related default.

There are undoubtedly varying quality grades of aftermarket DPFs. I was fortunate to successfully clean the original OE component, but I suspect it was never genuinely obstructed. The van remains idle for extended periods and is mostly utilised for long journeys, such as vacations; it is not employed for short trips. The vehicle has undergone several MoT tests with the remap, and emissions have consistently not posed an issue. I must admit that I have not verified the permissible emissions value for my Viano. I do not observe any excessive smoke. It is hardly noticeable while driving, and no one has commented on it while following. I have never encountered a problem with Superchips. In the 320D and 330D models, the chip modified the traction control settings, allowing the vehicle to maintain full power instead of abruptly cutting it when wheel slip was detected; it utilised the ABS to brake the slipping wheel instead. I assert that this is the remap we possessed. I have no grievances.

A plaque will be located beneath the hood or on your weight plate, displaying the maximum figure in the corner, typically less than 1.5; this is the maximum for earlier vehicles lacking the plate. My 2009 ALFA featured the number on the plate; therefore, your 2014 model will probably certainly have it as well.

In my own view, if you are able to continue using your original DPF, then you should do so. Following the engine overhaul, I believed that a new DPF would enhance reliability. The regens occurred at same intervals. However, I anticipate that the original would possess superior quality, thus it may not have deteriorated the M14 pressure port, as yours has not, or else you would not have been able to reinstall it. Thus, no benefit existed. Thank you for your reply. I have just reviewed Superchips; they are claiming an increase to 199 Bhp, but my primary concern is the torque for towing. The increase from 360Nm to 461Nm is a significant assertion. Do you emit any smoke while walking? Has your Viano undergone a MoT since the remapping? I am interested in emissions. Last October, I encountered difficulties obtaining my at 0.7, or is yours from before January 2014, thus permitted at 1.5?

Consumption was subpar this morning, as it presented an opportunity to explore a long-forgotten realm. The fuel efficiency was 20 mpg, and I saw that the suspension is inadequate with increased engine power. We opted for a Superchips chip remap conversion, having previously achieved significant success with it on a 330D and 320D. Our Viano was the 163 Bhp variant, and the Superchips remap is expected to elevate it to just over 200 Bhp. The conversion accelerates the rise of the rpm counter. and appears to possess ample torque. It is not as powerful as the 330D, which was a 200 to 250bhp enhancement and did not have the same weight as the van. This time, it involved a man in a van modification, whereas previously we utilised the Bluefin self-programming module. It will operate effectively with the parking brake applied. I acknowledge your observations regarding an aftermarket DPF; it serves as a valuable caution, as I have recently been contemplating the necessity of a new DPF and have been intrigued by the low cost of the aftermarket options.

Thank you for that. An error I committed was substituting my DPF with an aftermarket component four years ago. The substitute pressure tapping deteriorated. The replacement aftermarket component arrived, but the tailpipe was flared, rendering it impossible to connect two female ends. I am awaiting the delivery of an additional aftermarket component. The images appear correct, so I remain hopeful. I have also bought two stainless steel pressure line nuts, aiming to diminish the probability of corrosion. They will arrive from China in a few days. Is your mapping a chip remap or a plug-in remap? What is your assessment of it? Has it influenced consumption in any manner? My first Vito was remapped, resulting in increased torque at idle. The parking brake was virtually ineffective.

I recognise that I could have resolved the issue more expediently by consulting the dealer or an independent mechanic; but, I sought to circumvent the expense and prefer to troubleshoot myself. It has been excruciating. Best regards

It appears that a static regeneration is necessary, correct? This will reset the simulated figure. The test was repeatedly halted after around one minute owing to a "communications failure." Understood. As usual, I delayed until I could gather additional information. However, this week, after some random searching, I encountered a reference indicating that the van now possesses a new DPF. I have never performed that task previously since it lacks a new DPF; I merely cleaned it. However, I conducted further investigation and subsequently followed the protocol to inform it about the new DPF installation. I now obtain the figures below; the DPF light is extinguished. It has exited limp mode; it feels as though I have acquired a new van. It accelerates to 4,000 RPM and possesses substantial power. I can finally appreciate the superchips remap that was performed shortly after my purchase. All for merely a straightforward "Inform me that I possess a new or cleaned DPF."

Greetings, I wish to document my observations regarding a longstanding issue with the DPF on our Viano, in the hope that it may assist others. Our Viano encountered a DPF problem almost two years ago. Possibly more; it became limp and was limited to 3,000. The scanner indicated a malfunction with the O2 sensor and that the DPF was 200% saturated. I replaced the sensor and removed the DPF for cleaning. Reconfigured everything. and rectified the errors. However, I was unable to extract it from Limp. I examined every facet of the DPF system to ascertain if I overlooked anything, earnestly attempting (and likely failing) to refrain from indiscriminately replacing components. The scanner indicated that the boost sensor between the two turbos was absent. However, my engine, being the van model, is equipped with only one turbocharger. The back pressure sensor may be defective. I replaced the back pressure sensor without success; it subsequently became apparent that the Carsoft scanner was providing inaccurate information. I upgraded to a Mercedes Xentry laptop; subsequently, the prices decreased, and I sold the Carsoft. The differential pressure sensor was replaced in the interim. The MERC program provided real-time data from the DPF. This indicated to me that the DPF was unobstructed, with the exception of the simulation pressure.

An intriguing task would be to verify on a platform such as Partsouq whether the part number for the antenna has been modified in the latest model.