Chrishazle

It serves a function, but not on your automobile.

I purchased an AGM H6 battery from Walmart for my 2014 Audi R8. Although the installation process was rather challenging, I managed to complete it without having to remove the wipers.

It is worth noting that there is a very skilled Mercedes-Benz expert named Steve at Avantgarde Mercedes, located in Clevedon near Bristol.

Attempt to unlock using the key fob as a component of the comprehensive unlocking system. This might determine if the roof switch on the automobile is defective. Purchase a pre-owned icarsoft MB2 for the price of £100.

I have had both a black automobile and a white car. While they do look great when they are clean, they can be rather troublesome. since previously said, a silver or light grey car is the most practical choice since it does not show dirt as easily. Unless you like washing your car every day, it is advisable to choose for a lighter colour.

It is possible that my previous dark red Cavalier was involved in a rear-end collision and subsequently repaired. The paint work was flawless, rendering the difference indiscernible under natural light. However, in the illumination of street lights, it was readily apparent where the fresh paint had been applied.

Thank you. It seems that there might be several possibilities. Cars will be sent to the garage on Monday, so we will be able to determine the exact issue at that time. I will share the result after I have confirmed it.

Thank you for the information. I have scheduled an appointment for the automobile to be inspected at a nearby garage. The automobiles have a relatively low mileage of just over 40,000 kilometres, which indicates a potentially high cost.

The clutch pedal on my Evoque fails to automatically return to the upright position while shifting gears. Although the clutch is not experiencing slippage, it is inconvenient to manually lift the pedal with my foot. Do you have any hypotheses on the potential cause of this issue? I am unable to locate the master cylinder in order to inspect the fluid level.

I inadvertently neglected to provide an update in this context. I acquired my automobile in September. Initially, I had intended to get the Tango Red vehicle, but ultimately I opted for the Mythos Black instead due to its more intimidating appearance. Initial observations: The automobile is really quick. The RS5 is much superior in comparison. In frigid conditions and with the vehicle's tyres being cold, I recorded a time of 6.13 seconds for the 100-200 metre sprint. It is worth noting that the automobile had accumulated a mileage of 1200 km. That is an impressive time for a naturally aspirated vehicle with 620 horsepower. Given optimal circumstances, I believe I can get a time below 6.0. Acoustics: The sound quality remains satisfactory despite the presence of the OPF. The greatest difficulty are the valves that stay closed up to 5000rpm (even if performance mode). Installing a new exhaust system should resolve this issue. However, I must admit that I have not had the opportunity to listen to the sound produced by a R8 equipped with an aftermarket exhaust. The audio may be perceived in this video: https://photos.app.goo.gl/45GdyJRb1vGUkAJD7 (This occurred around 10 minutes after I initiated the car's ignition; it was not a cold start, but the engine had not yet reached its optimal operating temperature.) I own a film capturing a tunnel during a speed run from 60 to 130 kilometres per hour. Here is the link to access the movie: https://photos.app.goo.gl/X6gk5xLZbgZvwg3U7 Next steps: Acquire the front lip, fins, and side skirts from the R8 GT and proceed to install a quicksilver exhaust system.

It seems to be an excellent concept. Kindly direct message me when the time approaches, and I will gladly arrange a meeting with you to provide you with a cup of coffee. I anticipate acquiring the automobile at some juncture during the month of August, hence it is possible that you may also get a glimpse of it... Returning to our issue, I am presenting the official press material from the Audi media centre, which pertains to the introduction of the updated version. It examines all the disparities, however there is no mention of the engine being positioned 10cm lower. Another notable distinction I observed is that the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions amount to 302 – 297 grammes per kilometre (g/km). In the newest 2023 models, the emissions range from 297 to 293 g/km. It is important to note that greater emissions do not always indicate better performance.

I appreciate the input and the kind reception from all of you. Following extensive study and consultations with over 15 dealers, I would like to present my latest discoveries. To clarify, I must emphasise that the R8 is my ultimate aspiration in terms of cars. Since 2010, I have only encountered one instance of seeing and hearing it for the first time. Subsequently, I consistently display an image of a R8 on my desk as a constant reminder to exert more effort in order to get one. Now is the opportune moment. I went to inspect the Performante. Perhaps this is a subject more suitable for another discussion, but the EVO proves to be a superior option due to its track-oriented nature, lightweight interior designed to minimise weight, and much less reliance on technological assistance. The salesperson advised me to choose for a pre-owned all-wheel drive EVO with a low mileage of 4000km. The automobile was quite remarkable and emitted a noise level comparable to that of a 2017 v10+. However, while being aware of the superiority of the EVO, I had an inexplicable inclination towards choosing the R8. In addition, the additional 50000 francs do not justify the performance increases (although they do justify the brand and more attention). My perplexity on the disparities in performance between the 2019 and the 2021+ models arose from the following posts: The launch control of the Gen 2 has encountered a failure. On page 2, @4RINGS said, "I have consistently expressed this viewpoint since my friend purchased a 2020 model and we engaged in a drag race. My vehicle is a 2019 model, and the outcome was unfavourable. I completed the race in 10.4 seconds, reaching a speed of 132 mph, with a 0-60 acceleration time of 2.5 seconds. In contrast, my friend completed the race in 11.1 seconds, reaching a speed of 127 mph, with a 0-60 acceleration time of 3.1 seconds." Nevertheless, this particular edition of the vehicle is the North American variant equipped with a 610 horsepower engine. I presume that its performance may be significantly compromised compared to the original version, since it lacks 10 horsepower. Nevertheless, in the RS E-Tron GT, it outperforms the R8 V10 Performance Green Hell in terms of acceleration, namely in the 0-60 mph and quarter-mile tests. The individual making this statement also mentions that their own vehicle is an 18 V-10 Plus model. Apologies, I have also provided evidence demonstrating that such automobiles possess superior speed compared to the upgraded autos." Matt from carwow consistently achieved 10.7 second runs with the first facelifted R8 models, but now he achieves times of 11.1 to 11.2 seconds. Nevertheless, it is evident from the video that he achieves a time of 11.0 seconds with the rear-wheel drive (RWD) variant, which has a somewhat lower horsepower (although with heated tyres). Therefore, I infer that the disparities in performance are mostly attributable to the prevailing circumstances rather than inherent variations in the vehicles themselves. Nevertheless, there are discernible disparities in the updated iterations (specifically referring to the European Union models alone). The 2019 and 2020 R8 models adhere to the Euro 6d-TEMP EVAL emission standard, as shown in this reference. The R8 models for the years 2021, 2022, and 2023 adhere to the Euro 6d-ISC-FCM emission standard, which is somewhat more stringent. Refer to the official technical data for further information. I am uncertain about the potential impact of the more stringent pollution rules on the dynamic/performance mode, while they may have an influence on the comfort option. Nevertheless, I have seen inconsistencies in the films, not limited to those produced by carwow. In this video, the Automann achieves a speed of 100-200 km/h in 6.7 seconds utilising a 2021 v10 performance spyder, which is 100 kilogrammes heavier (1695 kg versus 1595 kg) and has worse aerodynamics. Nevertheless, the individual seen in the video achieves a speed of 100-200 in 6.2 seconds during the first attempt, while the second attempt with the windows down takes 6.7 seconds. Regarding my RS5, it achieves 100-200 runs (measured with dragy) within a time range of 8.9 - 9.5 seconds. Typically, it achieves a score of 9.3. In addition, my quarter-mile timings range from 11.5 to 11.6 seconds, while Matt from carwow consistently achieves a pace of 12.0 seconds with RS5s. Therefore, I concur with @CCMONE's viewpoint that the disparities in performance may be attributed to negligible discrepancies and are mostly influenced by weather and tyre conditions rather than the characteristics of the automobile. Next, the challenges I anticipate encountering are: The inefficient soft-limiter at 3500rpm. Only an ECU remapping can eliminate it, but modifying the software of a new automobile is also imprudent. I likely need a discussion with my therapist to see how I can come to terms with this. The OPF/GPF filters. An expedited depletion of the soul will resolve this issue and amplify the sound to a level equivalent to or beyond that of a V10 engine (hopefully). The audio in this video is quite impressive, and I hope it is also sufficiently loud. Has anybody have any experience with QS? Ultimately, what is the purpose for documenting all of these specific particulars? Having seen several misleading or false posts/reviews, I have spent a considerable amount of time in vain. Therefore, it would be beneficial to consolidate all this information into a single thread, sparing others from enduring the same ordeal.

Greetings, everybody. Having enjoyed the ownership of a 2019 RS5 for over four years, I believe it is now appropriate to transition and get a R8 v10 performance quattro. Nevertheless, the farther I go into the matter, the greater my perplexity becomes. After much study and some aggravation, I have narrowed down my selections to the following choices. It is worth noting that I am based in Switzerland and hence considering the EU/German version. Acquire a 2018 model that has not undergone any cosmetic changes. Advantages: Absence of optimal power flow (OPF) and soft limiter. There are other aftermarket choices available, including the Akrapovic exhaust, which is the most affordable alternative. Drawbacks: The vehicle has a powerful 610 horsepower, but being 5 years old, it may be difficult to find one with low mileage. Additionally, the maintenance costs are likely to be higher due to the necessity for more frequent replacements. Undergo a cosmetic procedure to rejuvenate your appearance, with a maximum distance of 10,000 km travelled since the last procedure. Model from the year 2019: Advantages: 620 horsepower; The engine is positioned 10mm lower compared to the pre-facelift model. Considerably swifter: The acceleration time from 0 to 200 kilometres per hour is 8.9 seconds, whereas the time from 100 to 200 kilometres per hour is 6.0 seconds (as seen in the referenced video). Additionally, the carwow source reports that the acceleration time from 0 to 400 kilometres per hour is 10.7 seconds. In my opinion, it is aesthetically superior than the pre-facelift version. Drawbacks: Overhead power factor (OPF); soft limiter engaged at 3500 revolutions per minute (rpm); Requires a non-original exhaust system, except the Akrapovic brand. The price for one is around 180,000 CHF. Purchase a 2023 model: Regrettably, the dealer informed me that orders ceased in November 2022. Nevertheless, there are some automobiles slated for arrival in 2023 that remain unclaimed by any bidder, affording me the opportunity to acquire one of them. Advantages: The automobile is brand new and has a "sport exhaust" feature. Drawbacks: EU standards have become more stringent, resulting in 2022 models being inferior to those from 2019. Can someone kindly verify this? The primary proof I have consists of the carwow videos, which consistently demonstrate faults with the launch control in 2020-2021 models. Additionally, these videos indicate that the car's performance timings are worse, as seen by an 0-400 time of 11.1 seconds instead of the expected 10.7 seconds. I came across a post on this topic (although I couldn't locate it) stating that someone compared their 2019 model with a 2020 model in a race, and the 2019 version shown a notable superiority in terms of speed. Could someone kindly verify this information? An option is to purchase one from Germany for around 230,000 euros, with an additional 6% import tax. Acquire a 2018 Huracan Performante: The cost of a pre-owned Performante is around 270,000 CHF, which is in close proximity to the amount I want to spend on the new R8. Nevertheless, I am concerned that the combined expenses of maintenance and insurance for the vehicle may surpass those of the R8, perhaps becoming it unaffordable for me. Additionally, I have the following inquiries: If I were to acquire a facelifted 2019+ R8 model and install an aftermarket exhaust system, such as the Capristo brand, would the resulting sound resemble that of the 2017 R8 model? Did they make modifications to the ECU in order to reduce the occurrence of pops and cracks? Audi made enhancements to the 2023 GT, such as upgrading the gearbox electronic control unit and raising the soft restriction to 6500rpm. Do any of these changes apply to the 2023 version? Is there any discernible difference between the 2023 iteration and the 2022/2021/2020 versions? Are there any individuals who own a 2020 or newer version of the product and are experiencing issues with the launch control feature? Kindly provide the 0-100, 100-200, and 0-400 acceleration times for the v10 performance quattro variant. What is your suggestion? Thank you in advance.

Indeed, I followed a similar course of action with my own vehicle. I removed the 19" wheels and replaced them with a set of the original standard factory wheels, which I had restored to their original condition. As a result, the car's handling and overall driving performance have much improved. (Cosy) I too resent paying the additional road tax, so I intentionally acquired a vehicle manufactured before 2006.

I would abstain from operating it. An unexpected convulsion or a sudden engine failure might forcefully propel you into a dense shrubbery - or perhaps result in a more dire outcome.

As said before. The local dealer cautioned me against using these vehicle washes due to their potent and abrasive cleaning agents, as well as their rough washing materials.

Our previous L538 model, which had the same specifications as yours including 20-inch rims, exhibited great ride quality without any problems. I am curious whether the manufacturer of your tyre may be having an impact? Currently equipped with the L551 model, including 21-inch rims.

Did you ultimately get the M6?

Was a solution ever discovered for the issue? When I visited the authorised dealership, they informed me that there were no alternatives available save for purchasing a new command unit, which they deemed to be not cost-effective, leaving me with no other option than to accept the situation. We express our gratitude for your input.

Which specific dealer was involved in the transaction?

I have a negative opinion towards GAP insurance. The perceived value of an extended warranty is much higher, which likely explains the reluctance to include it. The rationale of placing a deposit on an automobile without physically seeing it is unclear, given this action relinquishes one's ability to negotiate advantageous terms. It is presumed that a significant reduction was obtained from the initial price requested.

The size and angle of the rear window prompt a need for the inclusion of a rear wiper. The outcome will be seen with the occurrence of a little snowfall.

Is it packaged in a box with a gold lining?

In my perspective, the current state of affairs is deemed inadequate for its intended function. How do manufacturers manage to evade accountability?

It is recommended to choose for the additional payment of $20 in order to have the item manually cleaned. Many comprehensive vehicle wash facilities provide this additional service, sometimes at an additional cost of around $10. There is no valid justification for using an automatic vehicle wash. The mechanical motion of the wheels causes damage to the vehicle, such as breaking off mirrors. Forgetting to activate the automatic windshield wipers results in the need to purchase a new windshield due to the blades being torn off by the wiper arm and causing significant scratches. Alternatively, one may have to engage in a dispute with the car wash facility to get compensation.