All Activity

Thank you for your response. I am fairly certain it is the CIS system. It may be 280E rather than E280, but it is 1980. Thank you.

The 280E spanned two distinct generations. The W114 employed Bosch D Jetronic, whereas the W123 utilised Bosch K Jetronic. If your vehicle is equipped with D-Jet technology, seek an individual knowledgeable in this system; they may be specialists in Volkswagen or Volvo, as it was utilised in those brands. Any German automotive professional knowledgeable about 1980s vehicles, particularly those specialising in the Ford Capri (2.8i) or XR4i, will be familiar with this technology. If it is an E280, it will be from 1993 or later and will utilise Bosch Motronic fuel injection.

🙂

Seeking a somebody in South Lincolnshire to examine a friend's E280 injection system. Thank you

😁

I consistently advocate for initiating with the utmost simplicity when addressing such challenges. Given its intermittent nature followed by a non-drivable issue, have you verified that all ground connections are secure and free from corrosion? There are numerous items in the new BMWs, including some located beneath the front carpeting. If it has been malfunctioning for some time, it may have become detached beyond its capacity to ground, or the vehicle may have experienced prior water intrusion, resulting in mild corrosion of the ground connection. A friend of mine with an X6M recently encountered a comparable issue. He took it to an independent mechanic who replaced numerous components without resolving the problem. I visited, lifted the front passenger carpet (the passenger side on a left-hand drive UK vehicle, near the A-pillar just south of the glove box), cleaned and tightened the three grounding points located there (the bottom two were corroded due to his wife leaving a window open, which soaked the passenger side years prior). After pressing the button, the vehicle started without any subsequent issues.

I consistently advocate for initiating with the utmost simplicity with such matters. Given the intermittent nature of the issue, which has escalated to a non-drivable problem, have you verified that all ground connections are secure and free from corrosion? There are numerous items in the new BMWs, including some located beneath the front carpeting. If it has been malfunctioning for an extended period, it may have become detached beyond its capacity to ground, or the vehicle may have experienced prior water intrusion, resulting in mild corrosion of the ground connection. A friend of mine with an X6M recently encountered a comparable problem. He took it to an independent mechanic who replaced numerous components without success. I visited, lifted the front passenger carpet (the passenger side on a left-hand drive UK vehicle, near the A-pillar just south of the glove box), cleaned and secured the three grounding points located beneath it (the bottom two were corroded due to his wife leaving a window open, which soaked the passenger side years prior). After addressing this, I pressed the button, and it started immediately—there have been no issues since.

Firstly, I greatly appreciate your response! This situation is overwhelming me! I verified the electricity from the fuse through the firewall connector. From that point to the trans connection plug, power was sent to the GCS. I was attempting to ascertain which pin directed to the subsequent location and what that entailed. I am presently attempting to identify the CAS module to confirm the power and signal to it at this moment.

Given the several problems, it appears to be a power supply issue. You are at the wiring diagram section to verify the power supplies from the CAS and JBE, as that is where the power for the various modules in the vehicle originates

My X5 intermittently displayed "transmission malfunction" on the dashboard for approximately four months. No drivability concerns were present. Suddenly, it failed to crank, start, or activate the accessory lights upon pressing the start button. I scanned it and discovered a trans code indicating a voltage of less than 6.7v. I examined the battery and measured 12.43 volts. I charged the battery nonetheless. I subsequently verified the power flow from the battery to the fuse box and then to the transmission connector. I replaced the starter as planned, and I also replaced the GCS/valve body under the assumption that the transmission computer was defective. Unsuccessful. What should I do next?

🫡

I purchased a Wolfbox rearview dash cam. Functions exceptionally well. Significantly improved rear visibility and infrequently impacted by weather conditions. It is imprudent of Toyota designers to neglect rear visibility when the vehicle is stationary.

Toyota's decision to reposition the centre brake light to align with the standard brake lights represents a regressive advancement in safety.

It is reasonable to assume that a rear wiper would have been included.

It is regrettable that you did not verify:🙄

I share the same sentiment; it poses no difficulty for me either travelling locally or over large distances, including vacations to France in both summer and winter with two electric mountain bikes on the towbar bike carrier. Agree that the 360 camera functions effectively; however, the rear visibility is limited when the bicycles are mounted in the rear.

I have owned my vehicle for a year, and the absence of a rear wiper is not an issue; nonetheless, the 360-degree camera functions exceptionally well.

The digital rearview mirror display is exclusively available on the highest model levels.

Apply ceramic spray or Rain-X to facilitate water dispersion. I hardly utilise the back window wiper on my first-generation C-HR, and I understand that the second generation features an advanced rearview camera, rendering a wiper unnecessary.

I have recently received a new Toyota C-HR. Excellent automobile, albeit with one issue. It lacks a rear wash wipe. Toyota asserts that the rear window's pronounced slope causes water to be expelled at high speeds. The issue is that it must be moving at a certain velocity to be effectively washed away. Certainly, that also pertains to a soiled window. Exercise caution if you are considering the purchase of one of these vehicles.

In the past, I inadvertently secured my keys inside on several occasions. The initial occurrence was, oddly, directly outside the Bromley police station. I entered with a sheepish demeanour and provided an explanation. The man at the desk enquired about the make of the car. Austin A60. He provided me with a set of keys, stating, "One of these will fit." The initial one succeeded. Individuals exhibited a high degree of trust throughout that period. I applied this knowledge when I performed the same procedure on my Bedford CA, which is also an FS series key. Feeling embarrassed, I enquired of a gentleman parked along the road if he would assist me by unlocking my van. I believed his key would be compatible. Indeed, that occurred. Neither vehicle was particularly valuable, although the A60 was stolen on one occasion. Parked it in the centre of Regent Street, left the headlights on, and depleted the battery. They clearly did not consider it worth retaining.

The fob was inoperative since it was not her vehicle. It was unexpected that the key functioned.

seems really suspicious to me Why utilise the key when one possesses the fob, particularly considering that a female may wish to avoid soiling or damaging her nails? I trust you still possess your Evoque, my friend.

I am unable to address your inquiry; nevertheless, a similar incident occurred with my friend's BMW several years ago. While we were in a parking lot, he activated the unlock button as we neared his vehicle, and another BMW of the same model and colour responded by beeping and unlocking as well. We drove a considerable distance, returned on foot to the other BMW to secure it, then walked back to his vehicle and departed.