All Activity

He states that the 2022 C-class is not associated with the 3G discontinuation. The MB Me service is exhibiting erratic behaviour, as it frequently does, albeit in various manners.

What is the model year? I speculate if it is associated with the cessation of 3G services.

I saw a considerable delay in the stated car location a few days ago.

Greetings to all I possess a 2022 C Class Estate and extensively utilise the Mercedes Me application on my iPhone. It consistently functions effectively and provides information regarding the vehicle's status, security condition, location, and more. Recently, the application has ceased functioning, albeit sporadically. For instance, it inaccurately displays the car's location, indicating a position I occupied an hour prior. It indicates that the automobile is unlocked when it is not. It does not respond to the app's request to lock the doors, open the windows, etc. It appears that a Mercedes server may be malfunctioning or operating at a significantly reduced speed. The issue cannot be attributed to network connection problems, as the vehicle has consistently functioned well in the same locations for several years. Then a few hours later - while the car is in the same location everything starts worming again. It is sporadic yet notably common in recent days. Is anyone else observing this behaviour, please? Or is it a recognised issue that I have not picked up on? I observed that an individual on Twitter (X) reported similar behaviour regarding his vehicle a few days prior. I am enquiring whether there exists a global issue with the system. Do you have any suggestions? Warm regards

Once more, the inquiry is whether anyone has adapted the 340HP "S" capacity to the non-"S" variant, as there seems to be no mechanical constraints preventing the higher output configuration.

https://mazdas247.com/forum/t/cx-90-turbo-s-vs-turbo-differences-and-drivetrain-notes.123879223/

Found this with more detailed details:

I suppose the internet was wrong. Querying “inter-cooler” on the Mazda parts website yields a singular heat exchanger part number for the CX-90, seemingly irrespective of the Turbo/Turbo S differentiation.

Embarrasingly, "I read it on the internet". I am uncertain whether it was in this topic or another, as I can not clearly remember the location. Some posts now say it may be related to towing capacity being raised to 5K from 3.5K, wrt the air/water intercooler.

Where did you find that the intercooler is different?

Looking at what I can find, the difference between the Turbo & Turbo S is they have the same engine & turbo, but the "S" has a larger intercooler and different ECU programming. Has anyone tried porting the "S" programming to a non-"S" engine?

🙂

The dashboard's fill level indicator is occasionally unreliable and requires rebooting with a diagnostic equipment.

I do not either, to be honest. It is conceivable that it may be possible.

Thank you for the advice.

I am reluctant to confess my ignorance. Can anyone provide guidance?

I would perform a complete recharge and subsequently assess the range. I advise utilising an Adblue pump at a service station instead of a bottle, which may result in spillage. The pumps include an automated shutoff mechanism.

Is it feasible to submerge the tank?

May I request your guidance regarding the Ablue range? One week post its second service, my 2023 C220d displayed a warning indicating a remaining AdBlue range of 450 miles. My initial thought was that the Mercedes-Benz main dealer had not replenished the standard 10 litres, despite the notation on the documentation. The dealer's response indicated that they had replenished it, suggesting a potential sensor issue, specifically referencing the NOx sensor. The vehicle was scheduled for a follow-up appointment; however, due to an impending long journey, I deemed it wise to add extra maintenance myself. The range has promptly expanded by 1000 kilometres. My inquiry is if, if the vehicle experienced a NOx sensor malfunction, it would not display a fault message instead of a range warning. I believe the Dealer is attempting to deceive me - what are your opinions? Warmest Regards

I understand your perspective and your justified caution. My perspective is that a car valued at over £60,000 is unlikely to be test-driven by seventeen-year-olds, though I may be mistaken. According to TDudette, the running nowadays is not really necessary. Only a genuine M automobile need a break-in time, as the other models have not undergone the modifications by the M division.

I understand your perspective and your justified caution. My perspective is that a car valued at over £60,000 is unlikely to be test-driven by seventeen-year-olds, though I may be mistaken. According to TDudette, the running nowadays is not really necessary. Is it advisable to perform an oil change following the break-in period?

I understand your perspective and your justified caution. My perspective is that a car valued at over £60,000 is unlikely to be test-driven by seventeen-year-olds, though I may be mistaken. According to TDudette, the running nowadays is not really necessary.

I would advise caution; nevertheless, certain engines do not require extensive break-in periods, or at least not for prolonged durations. I cannot recall all the specifics, so please conduct some research on the topic.I understand that my engine (S55) requires the essential RIS, yet I have also heard that it is not imperative.

Registered in September 2025, this highly desirable vehicle is equipped with nearly every optional feature and is listed for £61,000 at a prominent BMW dealership. It has completed approximately 1400 miles, and I have been informed that it will reach up to 1500 kilometres upon delivery to me. I am apprehensive regarding the adequacy of the break-in period for this car over the 1500 kilometres and the probability that it has been subjected to excessive use, as is typical with demonstrator vehicles. My comprehension, together with BMW's guideline for the initial 1200 miles, indicates that the break-in phase is critical and may affect the vehicle's longevity if beyond. Can anyone, particularly BMW personnel, provide insight on whether it is feasible that it has been abused? Is this offer excessively advantageous to be credible?

🙃