All Activity

I have Bluetooth connection which works ok, only dont have the sat nav and dab, which I would like to upgrade but unsure as to which Idrive I have currently.. I have verified the VIN on several websites, which indicate that the DAB and satellite navigation are standard features; however, I find myself perplexed and suspect that the dealership may have misled me. The dealership stated that the vehicle did not possess satellite navigation and was in poor condition upon receipt as a trade-in.

In the near run you could just buy a phone cradle and one of those £10 bluetooth adapters which allows you play audio through the FM radio. I assume you have a smart phone of some description?

Acquire a new display and obtain a CarPlay/MMI box or equivalent; I would advise against a touchscreen, as it poses a safety risk in my opinion. My previous courtesy vehicle featured a touchscreen, which I found somewhat distracting when driving.

Greetings, I am seeking guidance on upgrading the navigation and DAB system in my 2019 BMW 520 G31, which now lacks these features. Any assistance would be appreciated. Currently looking at ebay, do I need a new display screen and radio unit? Would it be more advantageous to acquire a new Android display unit radio? For your information, my current display unit lacks touchscreen functionality, and the radio does not include a CD player; I am uncertain if this is relevant. Thanks for the help!

He states that the 2022 C-class is not associated with the 3G discontinuation. The MB Me service is exhibiting erratic behaviour, as it frequently does, albeit in various manners.

What is the model year? I speculate if it is associated with the cessation of 3G services.

I saw a considerable delay in the stated car location a few days ago.

Greetings to all I possess a 2022 C Class Estate and extensively utilise the Mercedes Me application on my iPhone. It consistently functions effectively and provides information regarding the vehicle's status, security condition, location, and more. Recently, the application has ceased functioning, albeit sporadically. For instance, it inaccurately displays the car's location, indicating a position I occupied an hour prior. It indicates that the automobile is unlocked when it is not. It does not respond to the app's request to lock the doors, open the windows, etc. It appears that a Mercedes server may be malfunctioning or operating at a significantly reduced speed. The issue cannot be attributed to network connection problems, as the vehicle has consistently functioned well in the same locations for several years. Then a few hours later - while the car is in the same location everything starts worming again. It is sporadic yet notably common in recent days. Is anyone else observing this behaviour, please? Or is it a recognised issue that I have not picked up on? I observed that an individual on Twitter (X) reported similar behaviour regarding his vehicle a few days prior. I am enquiring whether there exists a global issue with the system. Do you have any suggestions? Warm regards

Once more, the inquiry is whether anyone has adapted the 340HP "S" capacity to the non-"S" variant, as there seems to be no mechanical constraints preventing the higher output configuration.

https://mazdas247.com/forum/t/cx-90-turbo-s-vs-turbo-differences-and-drivetrain-notes.123879223/

Found this with more detailed details:

I suppose the internet was wrong. Querying “inter-cooler” on the Mazda parts website yields a singular heat exchanger part number for the CX-90, seemingly irrespective of the Turbo/Turbo S differentiation.

Embarrasingly, "I read it on the internet". I am uncertain whether it was in this topic or another, as I can not clearly remember the location. Some posts now say it may be related to towing capacity being raised to 5K from 3.5K, wrt the air/water intercooler.

Where did you find that the intercooler is different?

Looking at what I can find, the difference between the Turbo & Turbo S is they have the same engine & turbo, but the "S" has a larger intercooler and different ECU programming. Has anyone tried porting the "S" programming to a non-"S" engine?

🙂

The dashboard's fill level indicator is occasionally unreliable and requires rebooting with a diagnostic equipment.

I do not either, to be honest. It is conceivable that it may be possible.

Thank you for the advice.

I am reluctant to confess my ignorance. Can anyone provide guidance?

I would perform a complete recharge and subsequently assess the range. I advise utilising an Adblue pump at a service station instead of a bottle, which may result in spillage. The pumps include an automated shutoff mechanism.

Is it feasible to submerge the tank?

May I request your guidance regarding the Ablue range? One week post its second service, my 2023 C220d displayed a warning indicating a remaining AdBlue range of 450 miles. My initial thought was that the Mercedes-Benz main dealer had not replenished the standard 10 litres, despite the notation on the documentation. The dealer's response indicated that they had replenished it, suggesting a potential sensor issue, specifically referencing the NOx sensor. The vehicle was scheduled for a follow-up appointment; however, due to an impending long journey, I deemed it wise to add extra maintenance myself. The range has promptly expanded by 1000 kilometres. My inquiry is if, if the vehicle experienced a NOx sensor malfunction, it would not display a fault message instead of a range warning. I believe the Dealer is attempting to deceive me - what are your opinions? Warmest Regards

I understand your perspective and your justified caution. My perspective is that a car valued at over £60,000 is unlikely to be test-driven by seventeen-year-olds, though I may be mistaken. According to TDudette, the running nowadays is not really necessary. Only a genuine M automobile need a break-in time, as the other models have not undergone the modifications by the M division.

I understand your perspective and your justified caution. My perspective is that a car valued at over £60,000 is unlikely to be test-driven by seventeen-year-olds, though I may be mistaken. According to TDudette, the running nowadays is not really necessary. Is it advisable to perform an oil change following the break-in period?