All Activity

An intriguing task would be to verify on a platform such as Partsouq whether the part number for the antenna has been modified in the latest model.

There exists a thread pertinent to anyone experiencing the issue.

I lack experience with prior versions, but the reception in my my26 GTLS appears satisfactory, despite residing in a remote area and being 10 miles from my local DAB transmitter, which is not one of the larger antennas. Your mileage may vary, of course. Perhaps they overlooked the impact of glass roofs on diminishing the ground plane area previously.

I had no issues with DAB in my updated model; yet, residing in London, I would not anticipate any, given the abundance of transmitters.

Greetings. The GT Line S has a recognised issue. Prior talks have attributed this to the shark antenna on the glass of the panoramic roof. Upon acquiring the car, it was evidently inferior than the vehicle I had previously had. Identical location. There were discussions regarding Kia's potential resolution, but it ultimately did not materialise. It would be pleasant to believe that the updated model is superior. This might assist me in rationalising my desire to replace the automobile to my wife. 🙂

I believe inadequate DAB reception is solely attributable to location. In Peterborough, I encounter no issues while driving, save for one location where there is no signal. In the eastern region, specifically Norfolk and Suffolk, there is minimal DAB+ reception, with only the BBC multiplex available on DAB.

Greetings I presently possess a 23 registration GT Line S HEV. While I have somewhat acclimated to the unreliable DAB reception, I am curious whether the DAB reception has improved in the updated Sportage. Considering a potential upgrade and it would be beneficial to ascertain improvements. Thank you very much.

Concerning longevity, the Ingenium engine is not the most inferior; that assertion is somewhat exaggerated. However, it did have challenges upon its initial release, most of which have since been resolved or enhanced. Contemporary diesel engines exhibit reliability concerns compared to their predecessors due to the additional components and complexity introduced to comply with stringent Euro regulations. I believe that the fuel additive AR6900-D Max effectively aids in the functioning of the DPF and related components.

The crucial factor when purchasing a diesel car is the nature of your typical excursions; if they are brief, a diesel is unsuitable, irrespective of the brand. In response to your inquiry, the new D165 and D200 (204DTY) exhibit multiple alterations relative to the preceding D150, D180, and D240 (204DTH), one of which pertains to the timing belt.

The older models are problematic, and the newer ones will likely experience similar troubles as they age, including oil dilution and timing chain complications. A customer just arrived in his newly acquired Discovery Sport 2.0, unaware of potential issues, as he had not conducted a thorough inspection. This oversight could result in significant costs, as many buyers neglect to verify the condition of such vehicles. Repair costs exceed the vehicle's value. I can only offer counsel; proceed with caution, as you have been forewarned. It is certain to fail someday, as it is a ticking time bomb. I recall that during my ownership of the M4, there was some concern around crank hub failure in these vehicles; yet, such occurrences were infrequent, and the failure rate was notably low, leading many to avoid the issue.

Thank you for your prompt response. Does that pertain to models released after 2019 or those introduced subsequently? This is a 2021 model.

The 2.0-liter diesel engines Inginium engines are the worst available; I would advise against them. You were fortunate if you managed to avoid issues previously. Timing chains can cause a multitude of complications when they fail. It is regarded as the worst engine in history, particularly the 2.0 diesel variants, which exhibit significant issues. The identical engine is utilised in the Evoque, Discovery Sport, and other models.

Greetings, I am considering the acquisition of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. 2.0 D165 FWD Euro 6, with 50,000 kilometres. What are everyone's opinions about this model? I have explored other topics but have been unable to locate many pertaining to this specific topic. I have never owned an Evoque, but I have always desired one. I was considering a Discovery Sport; but, the updated Evoque design captivates me. The forums I am examining exhibit considerable diversity in opinions. I previously owned a 2017 F Pace 2.0 diesel, which I found satisfactory; however, I chose to downsize and sold it, however I now regret the reduction in size. I maintain awareness of service intervals and care for my vehicles.

My 639 has a curb weight of slightly under 2.2 tonnes. The gross train weight exceeds 4.9 tonnes. There is considerable tolerance required for the drivetrain to manage. The percentage growth can be obtained from websites that display the percentage of increase in circumference. However, this is primarily attributable to the additional revolutions required to initiate movement, particularly on an incline, if so chosen. Years ago, I upgraded the tyres on a Vito from 205/65 to 205/75 to enhance the ride quality. Over approximately 60,000 miles, it did not cause any damage. The speedometer was then as near to GPS accuracy as possible. I would not appreciate the road noise and atmosphere, but to each their own.

The gearbox rotates the propeller, which drives the differential, which turns the axles, which in turn rotate the wheels. Larger wheels may increase unsprung weight; yet, in the overall context of a one-ton van... What impact will they have?

I anticipate that the differential will fail before the automatic gearbox. However, that would be contingent upon the extent of your demands. Obtaining the torque specification for your box should be feasible. Subsequently, contrast the power output of motors directed towards it with that of your own.

Many van insurance providers are quite apprehensive regarding any non-standard practices.

A larger (non-standard) rolling radius will undoubtedly impose some additional strain on the drivetrain during acceleration. This van may be transporting approximately one tonne of payload or pulling 2.5 tonnes. However, the speedometer would undoubtedly provide an inaccurate reading, which would be inadvisable.

An automatic gearbox will remain unaffected; nevertheless, your speedometer will be inaccurate if the aspect ratio is not consistently maintained. Excessive alterations may lead to premature deterioration of your suspension and steering components.

Consult the handbook for the selection of available wheels and suggested tyres, and select one from that list. Installing tires outside the specified dimensions may affect insurance coverage.

Hello everyone, I possess a Vito W447. I desire an update to 17-inch wheels with robust tires. The BFG A/T tires are excessively bulky for my requirements, so I am considering the Yokohama Geolandar tire. I have been informed that installing an oversized tyre could damage the automatic transmission due to increased strain. Does anyone here possess experience with this topic? Thank you.

A low oil level could result in the pick-up tube momentarily ingesting air during high-speed cornering. The G-force displaced the oil to one side of the sump, resulting in oil hunger. The problem was partially resolved with the implementation of oil baffles and the configuration of sumps to mitigate this issue. Ford faced class action lawsuits in the USA due to significant big end bearing failures in their V6 engines, attributed to the massive circular slip lanes leading onto motorways, where vehicles would experience oil starvation caused by g-forces displacing oil away from the pickup tubes. I trust this issue has been resolved; nonetheless, I would not be astonished if it remains unaddressed.

It is important to note that low oil pressure does not inherently indicate low oil level. Low oil level is only significant if it results in low oil pressure; however, low oil pressure may arise from various other underlying issues. Therefore, monitoring oil pressure is more crucial than tracking oil level.