All Activity

In my own view, if you are able to continue using your original DPF, then you should do so. Following the engine overhaul, I believed that a new DPF would enhance reliability. The regens occurred at same intervals. However, I anticipate that the original would possess superior quality, thus it may not have deteriorated the M14 pressure port, as yours has not, or else you would not have been able to reinstall it. Thus, no benefit existed. Thank you for your reply. I have just reviewed Superchips; they are claiming an increase to 199 Bhp, but my primary concern is the torque for towing. The increase from 360Nm to 461Nm is a significant assertion. Do you emit any smoke while walking? Has your Viano undergone a MoT since the remapping? I am interested in emissions. Last October, I encountered difficulties obtaining my at 0.7, or is yours from before January 2014, thus permitted at 1.5?

Consumption was subpar this morning, as it presented an opportunity to explore a long-forgotten realm. The fuel efficiency was 20 mpg, and I saw that the suspension is inadequate with increased engine power. We opted for a Superchips chip remap conversion, having previously achieved significant success with it on a 330D and 320D. Our Viano was the 163 Bhp variant, and the Superchips remap is expected to elevate it to just over 200 Bhp. The conversion accelerates the rise of the rpm counter. and appears to possess ample torque. It is not as powerful as the 330D, which was a 200 to 250bhp enhancement and did not have the same weight as the van. This time, it involved a man in a van modification, whereas previously we utilised the Bluefin self-programming module. It will operate effectively with the parking brake applied. I acknowledge your observations regarding an aftermarket DPF; it serves as a valuable caution, as I have recently been contemplating the necessity of a new DPF and have been intrigued by the low cost of the aftermarket options.

Thank you for that. An error I committed was substituting my DPF with an aftermarket component four years ago. The substitute pressure tapping deteriorated. The replacement aftermarket component arrived, but the tailpipe was flared, rendering it impossible to connect two female ends. I am awaiting the delivery of an additional aftermarket component. The images appear correct, so I remain hopeful. I have also bought two stainless steel pressure line nuts, aiming to diminish the probability of corrosion. They will arrive from China in a few days. Is your mapping a chip remap or a plug-in remap? What is your assessment of it? Has it influenced consumption in any manner? My first Vito was remapped, resulting in increased torque at idle. The parking brake was virtually ineffective.

I recognise that I could have resolved the issue more expediently by consulting the dealer or an independent mechanic; but, I sought to circumvent the expense and prefer to troubleshoot myself. It has been excruciating. Best regards

It appears that a static regeneration is necessary, correct? This will reset the simulated figure. The test was repeatedly halted after around one minute owing to a "communications failure." Understood. As usual, I delayed until I could gather additional information. However, this week, after some random searching, I encountered a reference indicating that the van now possesses a new DPF. I have never performed that task previously since it lacks a new DPF; I merely cleaned it. However, I conducted further investigation and subsequently followed the protocol to inform it about the new DPF installation. I now obtain the figures below; the DPF light is extinguished. It has exited limp mode; it feels as though I have acquired a new van. It accelerates to 4,000 RPM and possesses substantial power. I can finally appreciate the superchips remap that was performed shortly after my purchase. All for merely a straightforward "Inform me that I possess a new or cleaned DPF."

Greetings, I wish to document my observations regarding a longstanding issue with the DPF on our Viano, in the hope that it may assist others. Our Viano encountered a DPF problem almost two years ago. Possibly more; it became limp and was limited to 3,000. The scanner indicated a malfunction with the O2 sensor and that the DPF was 200% saturated. I replaced the sensor and removed the DPF for cleaning. Reconfigured everything. and rectified the errors. However, I was unable to extract it from Limp. I examined every facet of the DPF system to ascertain if I overlooked anything, earnestly attempting (and likely failing) to refrain from indiscriminately replacing components. The scanner indicated that the boost sensor between the two turbos was absent. However, my engine, being the van model, is equipped with only one turbocharger. The back pressure sensor may be defective. I replaced the back pressure sensor without success; it subsequently became apparent that the Carsoft scanner was providing inaccurate information. I upgraded to a Mercedes Xentry laptop; subsequently, the prices decreased, and I sold the Carsoft. The differential pressure sensor was replaced in the interim. The MERC program provided real-time data from the DPF. This indicated to me that the DPF was unobstructed, with the exception of the simulation pressure.

An intriguing task would be to verify on a platform such as Partsouq whether the part number for the antenna has been modified in the latest model.

There exists a thread pertinent to anyone experiencing the issue.

I lack experience with prior versions, but the reception in my my26 GTLS appears satisfactory, despite residing in a remote area and being 10 miles from my local DAB transmitter, which is not one of the larger antennas. Your mileage may vary, of course. Perhaps they overlooked the impact of glass roofs on diminishing the ground plane area previously.

I had no issues with DAB in my updated model; yet, residing in London, I would not anticipate any, given the abundance of transmitters.

Greetings. The GT Line S has a recognised issue. Prior talks have attributed this to the shark antenna on the glass of the panoramic roof. Upon acquiring the car, it was evidently inferior than the vehicle I had previously had. Identical location. There were discussions regarding Kia's potential resolution, but it ultimately did not materialise. It would be pleasant to believe that the updated model is superior. This might assist me in rationalising my desire to replace the automobile to my wife. 🙂

I believe inadequate DAB reception is solely attributable to location. In Peterborough, I encounter no issues while driving, save for one location where there is no signal. In the eastern region, specifically Norfolk and Suffolk, there is minimal DAB+ reception, with only the BBC multiplex available on DAB.

Greetings I presently possess a 23 registration GT Line S HEV. While I have somewhat acclimated to the unreliable DAB reception, I am curious whether the DAB reception has improved in the updated Sportage. Considering a potential upgrade and it would be beneficial to ascertain improvements. Thank you very much.

Concerning longevity, the Ingenium engine is not the most inferior; that assertion is somewhat exaggerated. However, it did have challenges upon its initial release, most of which have since been resolved or enhanced. Contemporary diesel engines exhibit reliability concerns compared to their predecessors due to the additional components and complexity introduced to comply with stringent Euro regulations. I believe that the fuel additive AR6900-D Max effectively aids in the functioning of the DPF and related components.

The crucial factor when purchasing a diesel car is the nature of your typical excursions; if they are brief, a diesel is unsuitable, irrespective of the brand. In response to your inquiry, the new D165 and D200 (204DTY) exhibit multiple alterations relative to the preceding D150, D180, and D240 (204DTH), one of which pertains to the timing belt.

The older models are problematic, and the newer ones will likely experience similar troubles as they age, including oil dilution and timing chain complications. A customer just arrived in his newly acquired Discovery Sport 2.0, unaware of potential issues, as he had not conducted a thorough inspection. This oversight could result in significant costs, as many buyers neglect to verify the condition of such vehicles. Repair costs exceed the vehicle's value. I can only offer counsel; proceed with caution, as you have been forewarned. It is certain to fail someday, as it is a ticking time bomb. I recall that during my ownership of the M4, there was some concern around crank hub failure in these vehicles; yet, such occurrences were infrequent, and the failure rate was notably low, leading many to avoid the issue.

Thank you for your prompt response. Does that pertain to models released after 2019 or those introduced subsequently? This is a 2021 model.

The 2.0-liter diesel engines Inginium engines are the worst available; I would advise against them. You were fortunate if you managed to avoid issues previously. Timing chains can cause a multitude of complications when they fail. It is regarded as the worst engine in history, particularly the 2.0 diesel variants, which exhibit significant issues. The identical engine is utilised in the Evoque, Discovery Sport, and other models.

Greetings, I am considering the acquisition of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. 2.0 D165 FWD Euro 6, with 50,000 kilometres. What are everyone's opinions about this model? I have explored other topics but have been unable to locate many pertaining to this specific topic. I have never owned an Evoque, but I have always desired one. I was considering a Discovery Sport; but, the updated Evoque design captivates me. The forums I am examining exhibit considerable diversity in opinions. I previously owned a 2017 F Pace 2.0 diesel, which I found satisfactory; however, I chose to downsize and sold it, however I now regret the reduction in size. I maintain awareness of service intervals and care for my vehicles.

My 639 has a curb weight of slightly under 2.2 tonnes. The gross train weight exceeds 4.9 tonnes. There is considerable tolerance required for the drivetrain to manage. The percentage growth can be obtained from websites that display the percentage of increase in circumference. However, this is primarily attributable to the additional revolutions required to initiate movement, particularly on an incline, if so chosen. Years ago, I upgraded the tyres on a Vito from 205/65 to 205/75 to enhance the ride quality. Over approximately 60,000 miles, it did not cause any damage. The speedometer was then as near to GPS accuracy as possible. I would not appreciate the road noise and atmosphere, but to each their own.

The gearbox rotates the propeller, which drives the differential, which turns the axles, which in turn rotate the wheels. Larger wheels may increase unsprung weight; yet, in the overall context of a one-ton van... What impact will they have?

I anticipate that the differential will fail before the automatic gearbox. However, that would be contingent upon the extent of your demands. Obtaining the torque specification for your box should be feasible. Subsequently, contrast the power output of motors directed towards it with that of your own.